Editor,
In the quiet academic corridors of Umshyrpi College, Laban, Shillong, a growing sense of fear, frustration, and injustice is taking root among students. What should be an environment fostering learning and growth has, according to many students, turned into a space marked by uncertainty, pressure, and alleged administrative misconduct.
At the heart of these concerns lies a troubling pattern. Students claim that batches are selectively targeted and issued “final warning” notices, often without transparent justification. Within days, these warnings escalate into formal expulsions. However, the story does not end there. Parents are then summoned to the college, and after discussions, a monetary penalty is reportedly imposed—following which the expulsion is conveniently revoked.
To many, this raises serious questions. Is discipline being enforced—or is it being monetized?
What further deepens the concern is the apparent inconsistency in enforcement. Students who allegedly do not attend classes at all are said to face little to no consequences and are still permitted to sit for examinations. Meanwhile, those who miss classes due to genuine, unavoidable circumstances find themselves disproportionately targeted. This selective approach not only places financial strain on families but also subjects students and their parents to emotional distress and humiliation.
Beyond disciplinary practices, the academic environment itself appears to be in disarray. A fundamental expectation from any educational institution is a structured academic calendar—one that provides clarity and allows students to prepare effectively. However, students report that examination dates are often announced with minimal notice, sometimes just days or even a single day in advance. Such unpredictability severely hampers preparation and adds to the mounting stress.
The situation is compounded by the scheduling of examinations immediately following college events, many of which are compulsory. Students are warned of penalties or strict consequences for non-attendance, placing them in a difficult position—forced to choose between participation and adequate academic preparation.
Adding to the frustration is what students describe as a cycle of unfulfilled promises. During official events, assurances of improvement and progress are frequently made by the administration. Yet, when it comes to tangible changes—be it infrastructure, facilities, or academic reforms—little progress is visible. Instead, explanations citing low enrollment or lack of funds are repeatedly offered, leaving students disillusioned and increasingly distrustful.
The cumulative effect of these issues is profound. It is not merely about administrative inefficiencies—it is about the erosion of trust, fairness, and the very purpose of education.
Students, speaking collectively and cautiously, have expressed their concerns while requesting anonymity, fearing potential retaliation. Their voices reflect not rebellion, but a plea—a plea for transparency, accountability, and a system that treats every student with fairness and dignity.
As these concerns come to light, the question remains: will the relevant authorities take notice and act, or will these voices continue to echo unheard within the walls of the institution?
Name Withheld on Request
Via e-mail
